Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batty boy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 10:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Batty boy[edit]
- Batty boy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a dictionary item, not a well known word that belongs in an encyclopedia. One Of Seven Billion (talk) 19:03, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Move - to Wiktionary. Notability not sufficiently established to warrant this article. Eddie.willers (talk) 19:14, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It's already at Wiktionary (see wikt:batty boy) and this article already goes beyond a dicdef. Angr (talk) 10:30, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, good amount of discussion among multiple secondary sources, — Cirt (talk) 16:25, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The nominator's "not a well known word" is a long way wide of the mark. I have no connection with Jamaica but have been aware of this phrase for all of my adult life of forty years or so. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:29, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Move - to Wiktionary per User:One Of Seven Billion--Iniciativass (talk) 17:19, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Angr and Cirt. Good third-party sources and the discussion of the cultural context around the term is suitable for wikipedia. Sprocket (talk) 05:30, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.