Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battlestar (reimagining)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  09:37, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Battlestar (reimagining)[edit]

Battlestar (reimagining) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFICTION and WP:GNG. A merge discussion didn't achieve consensus (Talk:Battlestar_(fictional_spacecraft)#Merge_discussion_(2017)) so I think it's time to push the issue here. I don't think we need more than one article for all various battlestars from all different shows, and certainly not an article per different battlestar (classes?) per show. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:03, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:18, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete/Merge to List of spacecraft in Battlestar Galactica (2004 TV series) - The important guide here is WP:LISTN. I see no reliable, independent sources at all treating the Battlestars of the re-imagined series as a distinct group in my WP:BEFORE and as such this fails WP:LISTN.FOARP (talk) 10:01, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Clearly pure fancruft, that is unencyclopedic and fails GNG.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:42, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There aren't any sources here. Maybe if somebody could find a critical comparison between the old Battlestar Galactica imagining of battlestars and the new imagining. My search for sources on Battlestar Galactica (fictional spacecraft) has led me to believe that nobody cares enough to write such a piece. Rockphed (talk) 15:57, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.