Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the Greens
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Panadura Royal College#Annual Big Match. J04n(talk page) 01:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Battle of the Greens[edit]
- Battle of the Greens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article has turned out to be a replication of information in two articles St. John's College Panadura and Panadura Royal College. It was the consensus of two discussions on merging to merge the article to the two articles. However a user later block for sock puppetry recreated the article with the same content and again it was recreated by a user which seems to be a sock too. Cossde (talk) 03:17, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as per previous consensus and protect against future distruptive socks. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 April 7. Snotbot t • c » 19:23, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:16, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:30, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 00:50, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.