Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Vuhledar (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. UtherSRG (talk) 12:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Vuhledar[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted previously so could have been speedy G4, but may have been improved enough to survive new discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 23:54, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator - UtherSRG (talk) 12:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Russia, and Ukraine. UtherSRG (talk) 23:54, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Article has been improved a lot, new information, much more reliable sources, its also more relevant now, as Russian forces are trying to take the city yet again. SnoopyBird (talk) 01:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The battle is notable, especially since the area remains contested. TH1980 (talk) 01:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The battle is definitely notable, although the scope of the article might be worth further discussion later. From preliminary reports, the current Russian attack is a more serious effort than the recent minor skirmishing in Zaporizhia Oblast. The capture of Mykilske on Friday and the use of TOS-1 systems (normally controlled at the military district level) both suggest a significant effort of operational scale. Source: "Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, January 27, 2023".

RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 03:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Article has a lot of information, and Vuhledar is a really important city making several headlines and on the news a lot recently, which could bring a lot of new information. 73.17.35.238 (talk) 22:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Prior to January, the article was irrelevant, but the recent Russian push is notable enough for it's own article as many sources have reported on it. Jebiguess (talk) 14:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:for now at least. The articles about this war may need to be reorganized at some point, but there is a lot of painstaking and possibly important work here, and I don't see any point in deleting it. Elinruby (talk) 19:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.