Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Halidzor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close‎. The nominator is not allowed to participate in deletion discussions relating to Armenia or Azerbaijan as a non-EC editor per WP:GS/AA. I have separately, further blocked them as an arbitration enforcement measure for repeated violations of this rule. I did, however, look into their specific claims regarding this article's sourcing to establish whether the nomination is tendentious in toto or just de jure: while I did not look long enough to verify that GNG was met, I was able to quickly find coverage of the battle on Google Scholar in Turkish [1]and in French ([1]), suggesting a lack of proper WP:BEFORE and a basis for indefinite banning from AA. signed, Rosguill talk 14:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Halidzor[edit]

Battle of Halidzor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hello, I propose to delete this article and I give you my reasons, first I can't find any serious work on the "battle of halizdor" HERE, AND HERE, suddenly there are only Armenian sources, and especially the figure of 70,000 Ottomans, which is completely misused and without proving, the last source is not accessible and above all only sources from Armenian schools with domains ending with ".AM ", I propose to delete this article because it is Armenian propaganda. Movaigonel (talk) 11:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Bozkuş, Yıldız Deveci. "Ermeni tarih ders kitaplarında Türk imgesi." Yeni Türkiye 60 (2014): 2014. (Accessible as PDF from Google Scholar)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.