Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batman film (2012)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Moot. This is redundant to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batman 3 (2012). Fences&Windows 13:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Batman film (2012)[edit]
- Batman film (2012) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Fails Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and Wikipedia:Notability (films)#Future films, incomplete films, and undistributed films.-5- (talk) 21:07, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Question - Does anyone know what the hell's happening with this article? It's been moved into and back out of the incubator, has had its name changed more times than I've had hot dinners and was recently nominated under Batman 3 (2012). DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 21:54, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That's what I would also like to know. NativeForeigner (talk · contribs) closed the original AfD and sent the article to the incubator as per the consensus of the discussion. Sometime after, there was this discussion at NativeForeigner's talk page. As you'll see, I posted a query there a few hours ago asking basically the same thing. Cliff smith talk 22:26, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect to Batman in film#Third film (2012), which has more information than this brief article. There's no need for a separate article on this future film yet. Yes, it is virtually certain to be filmed and released on schedule, but we can't be absolutely sure it will be; and in any case when you look past the rumours, there's not enough to say about it to justify a separate article. Robofish (talk) 00:09, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as recreation of AFD'd material 76.66.195.196 (talk) 03:46, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Favonian (talk) 09:17, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.