Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batang Kaharian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-31 07:35Z

Batang Kaharian[edit]

This is not notable in the Philippines as this is produced by a religious organization. Everything related to Apollo Quiboloy's church(Kingdom of Jesus Christ: The Name Above Every Name) is not notable in the Philippines. Wikiuserphil 22:32, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because these people/shows are not notable in the Philippines. It's an advertisement for a religious sect Kingdom of Jesus Christ: The Name Above Every Name:

Wow, that is quite the walled garden. The articles on individual presenters should be deleted for a start, none of them assert any kind of notability beyond presenting a TV program. The articles on the TV programs themselves are borderline blatant advertising with lines such as "It is a great way for viewers to unwind and get deep sense of peace that comes from the comforting verses of the Scriptures.". So either delete or redirect to Kingdom of Jesus Christ: The Name Above Every Name (although the latter article has been prodded since the 24th). Demiurge 23:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the user who created this AfD is an apparent single-purpose account, and has been tagged as a sockpuppet by Voice of sngx (talk · contribs), who is also an SPA. Not sure what's going on behind the scenes here, but my votes above stand. Demiurge 23:46, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per Demiurge. --Dhartung | Talk 12:01, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletions. -- ⇒ bsnowball 14:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh. In general, I dislike mass deletions of this sort because it makes determining notability a difficult task for AfD-goers, and would have preferred if these were simply prodded. Now that I'm done whining, if these don't have proof of notability, delete per Demiurge; the sockiness/single-purposeness of the nominator doesn't make the nominated entries themselves less non-notable. (It could even be argued they're so non-notable, even the account nominating them for deletion isn't notable.) JDoorj a m Talk 22:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All per nom (notability). AsburyPark 16:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.