Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bat rock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 03:10, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bat rock[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD was contested by original poster, albeit in a pretty childish manner. Non-notable neologism. Steamroller Assault (talk) 09:17, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom -- Raziman T V (talk) 09:19, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and the article creator is on the way to a block. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 09:20, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unreferenced, non-notable, probably original research or just something made up. WWGB (talk) 09:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 14:31, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is not a recognized musical subgenre. No sources have been provided. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:00, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - Its a MUSIC genre!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.108.27.35 (talk) 17:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

— 74.108.27.35 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WWGB (talk) 00:57, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 17:40, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, can find no sources recognizing this musical genre. J04n(talk page) 17:44, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This is either a neologism or just plain made up. I really wish it wasn't, but it is, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 17:55, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete . This article has no sources, and the content is a huge joke. --Spencerz (talk) 19:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No sources, possible violation of WP:NEO. December21st2012Freak ^{Happy New Year!} at ≈ 19:44, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - While interesting, it strikes me as a WP:NEO, as other editors have pointed out. Cocytus [»talk«] 20:00, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.