Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basil Williams (Financial Expert)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete uncontested --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Basil Williams (Financial Expert)[edit]

Basil Williams (Financial Expert) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All of the sources for this article are press releases. I don't see how he is notable at all -- there are many people who are executives at hedge funds and/or investment firms, and there are no sources available that distinguish Mr. Williams from the rest.

There are a few other executives at PAAMCO who have articles as well and I intend to check out their articles as well. ArglebargleIV (talk) 20:40, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. User: ArglebargleIV makes legitimate points. Knox490 (talk) 04:21, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:40, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:40, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Sources in article not nearly enough. He does have some coverage (quoted in Reuters in 2011, 1-2 Bloomberg pieces (appointment)) - but not nearly enough. Note his name is shared with a cricketer with many more mentions (1000+ google-news) - filtering down with "hedge fund" or "paamco" leaves very few hits.Icewhiz (talk) 06:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.