Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basil Eastwood

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:50, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Basil Eastwood[edit]

Basil Eastwood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Could not find significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 00:30, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

* Delete: there is not enough WP:SIGCOV from sources I could find for the article to pass WP:BIO or WP:GNG. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 07:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed my opinion and now believed the article should be kept. The initial search I did was relatively cursory, but a more thorough search found sources with WP:SIGCOV that have been helpfully added to the article by Moonraker. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 10:07, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:37, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep notable by virtue of his honour. Mccapra (talk) 08:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.