Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barton Hawkins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –MuZemike 19:15, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barton Hawkins[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be self-promotional in nature, claims of his invention of the intramolecular kinetic isotope effect seem unlikely since he is not mentioned in that article (but I'm not a chemist). No significant coverage that I can find. --Nuujinn (talk) 18:21, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is a B K Hawkins with GS cites of 88, 21, 15, 11, 7... not enough for WP:Prof#C1. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:51, 20 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. I couldn't find any verification for his claimed biochemical advances, the idea of using the shareware model for creative content is not original to him, the citation record is not enough for WP:PROF, and what else is there? —David Eppstein (talk) 23:14, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.