Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Cook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete, obvious hoax. Sandahl 08:06, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barry Cook[edit]

Suspected hoax; a search for Barry Cook and Melbourne Victory brings up nothing but a wikipedia mirror, not to mention that someone who is apparently 17 probably hasn't been playing professional football for at least 6 years. PirateMink 02:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Super Strong Delete A very obvious and unimaginative load of nonsense, but not, strictly speaking, the patent variety. RMHED (talk) 03:01, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete . Obvious hoax. Tend to think that a sixteen year old who played for both Celtic and Rangers might have got at least some coverage. Additional thought: try adding add up all the seasons he has allegedly played. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 03:46, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Bduke (talk) 04:07, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy as nonsense per CSD G1 or G3. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 04:11, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete G3 as nonsense, plain and simple, so tagged. I'm going with G3 since it isn't quite patent nonsense; patent nonsense would be 892375qiouwwerahljkg;ahsd;aflwej;rlrweahjefkl;awejhfl;kawefjk;awelgkl;sdj;gha nnnlk;newa;rk;j. (Couldn't resist.) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 06:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, G3 per TPH. Obviously somebody has a pretty active imagination (author's username is Barry9191). Blueboy 96 06:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, nonsense/vandalism hybrid. Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 07:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.