Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bari Zell Weinberger, Esq.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bari Zell Weinberger, Esq.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable attorney. Seems somewhat promotional. Tinton5 (talk) 16:50, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article does not demonstrate notability.--Rpclod (talk) 21:21, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article does not demonstrate notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles are not required to demonstrate notability. Notability is not affected by Wikipedia's content. James500 (talk) 11:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Delete: The entry is now substantiated with outside links to Weinberger's authority, including authored books and journal articles. A fuller description of her accomplishments has also been added and referenced.JacquelineNH talk 23:55, 27 April 2015 00:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing significant, News found (mostly press releases and Huffington Post) a few links and Books as well. SwisterTwister talk 18:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Jobbing lawyer doing what lawyers do. Fails WP:GNG. Any media coverage is as fallout, not as significant coverage about the person. Seems to be part of advertising either her or her law firm, which is currently up for CSD as an advert. When was the last time we heard WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT used as a term in a deletion discussion? Fiddle Faddle 08:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.