Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbecue Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barbecue Records[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run-of-the-mill record label that does not satisfy corporate notability. Google search shows that it exists, and that it advertises itself on social media. We knew that. No third-party significant coverage found.

Repeatedly created in draft and article space, possibly for undisclosed payments. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Relevant Australian record label with several divisions incorporated like a radio station and a media magazine. Also the record label appears on google in a third part named Kiss Fm Australia.TomBlak152 (talk) 04:50, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Striking out blocked sockpuppet !vote Captain Calm (talk) 05:30, 22 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]

*I found that the subject appears in several pages of the media Kiss Fm Australia, do a search on the Kiss Fm Australia website.144.138.171.8 (talk) 04:56, 22 August 2020 (UTC) Striking out blocked sockpuppet !vote Captain Calm (talk) 05:30, 22 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Delete per nomination. The article is ostensibly about a record label, but it's mostly about the radio show they do on a notable station, and the bi-monthly magazine they publish. The label itself fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Reliably-sourced information about the radio show could be added to the Kiss FM Australia article, though that's currently written in an even more OTT promotional tone. I briefly considered moving this to an article about the show, but there's not enough reliable, secondary coverage about it for sufficient independent notability to justify a separate article. Captain Calm (talk) 06:02, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not satisfy WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Can't find sufficient independent reliable coverage.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:20, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a run of the mill small scale record label. Having gone through Category:Record labels established in 1999 we have lots of these.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:14, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The fact that every single source in the article is primary kind of upsets me. I tried looking it up on Google, but I found nothing but pages from Barbecue Records. Koridas 📣 19:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.