Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Staropoli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:22, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Staropoli[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe Sr. Staropoli meets the requirements of WP:NMUSIC or WP:NPROF. I looked for additional references and found only routine, run-of-the-mill local news coverage. Her book is held by at least 74 libraries (I don't know whether or not that's a significant number); I wasn't able to find any book reviews. Cheers, gnu 57 18:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 18:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 18:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 18:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 18:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 18:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR, WP:PROF, WP:NMUSIC, or other notability as a local educator and composer. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:42, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dubious -- My thought is that she approaches notability, without quite getting there. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was unable to find the significant independent coverage I believe is required to meet WP:GNG. I also found nothing to indicate she meets any SNG. Papaursa (talk) 15:28, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.