Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Snellenburg
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 23:16, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Barbara Snellenburg[edit]
- Barbara Snellenburg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Very minor career as a model and only bit parts as an actress, with roles like "Boobwatch Girl #4," or brief appearances on TV. Only sources to be found are the trivial, unreliable kind. Mbinebri talk ← 01:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn--minor roles only. JJL (talk) 01:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:04, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep - Though it's stubbish, I would think that being mentioned on IMDB establishes notability. Ceranthor 01:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Changing to weak keep - Per my cleanup of the article. Not sure if she's really notable, though. Ceranthor 01:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have to disagree: anyone can have a page on IMDb as long as they have done something (even the most insignificant of roles/positions) on some film and are willing to register, so having a page there isn't an assertion of notability in and of itself. Mbinebri talk ← 02:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The fact that the actor is credited with roles in notable productions is what is required to establish notability per WP:ENTERTAINER. See the current helpful discussion at Sonia Darrin Esasus (talk) 02:53, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:ENTERTAINER explicitly requires the subject to have had significant roles in notable productions, which Snellenburg does not appear to have, as I previously stated. The discussion on Darrin is obviously inapplicable here, as an editor has asserted she had significant roles and thus meets notability criteria. I also fail to see any significant coverage from sources that meet WP:RS. Mbinebri talk ← 03:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. She is very pretty, but she doesn't meet WP:ENTERTAINER by a long shot. THF (talk) 23:10, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.