Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Mujica (writer)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn thanks to WP:HEY. (non-admin closure) lettherebedarklight晚安 03:12, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Barbara Mujica (writer)[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Barbara Mujica (writer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
sources in article are two pieces from the same author and magazine. fails general notability guideline. lettherebedarklight晚安 00:25, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and United States of America. lettherebedarklight晚安 00:25, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete per WP:AUTHOR, doesn't pass any of it's criteria.Keep per Beccaynr's argument. MaterialWorks (talk) 00:33, 30 January 2023 (UTC)- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:45, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:AUTHOR - Substantial content was removed by another editor before this nom [1] and an online search for reviews finds 4 on Kirkus Reviews [2], 2 from Publishers Weekly [3] [4] (for Frida and Sister Teresa), and Al Día [5] (for Miss Del Rio), a scholarly review via JSTOR [6] (for Women Writers of Early Modern Spain: Sophia's Daughters), and she is Emeritus Faculty at Georgetown University [7]. I have not yet searched the WP Library, but notability already appears supported and the article can be developed. Beccaynr (talk) 14:38, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia Library sources
|
---|
|
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Beccaynr (talk) 16:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep as per convincing argument made by Beccaynr CT55555(talk) 01:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment - in advance of developing this article, I started an article for one of her notable works: Sister Teresa. Beccaynr (talk) 02:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Her faculty profile is also a substantial starting point for additional research. Beccaynr (talk) 04:07, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: A GNG pass, per the credible sources provided by Beccaynr. A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 02:51, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per points raised by Beccaynr and others. Subject meets notability guidelines.--SouthernNights (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - easily passes both WP:NPOL and WP:BASIC. Greg Henderson (talk) 18:00, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- The subject is a
scholar, novelist, short story writer, and literary critic
- how does Barbara meet the politician notability guideline you linked? Thanks. VickKiang (talk) 21:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- The subject is a
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.