Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Howe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to North Carolina gubernatorial election, 2012. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:53, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Howe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested Prod. Subject fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG. Unsuccessful political candidate who has received no discernible coverage outside of local and routine campaign press. Should be deleted or redirected to an appropriate page. Ddcm8991 (talk) 19:35, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete: I suppose she isn't notable, although, as far as Libertarians go, she is reasonably successful. PrairieKid (talk) 05:26, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:36, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep She appears to have received some news coverage over the years. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to North Carolina gubernatorial election, 2012 as is our standard practice for unelected candidates who have received run-of-the-mill campaign coverage, per WP:POLITICIAN. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:24, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 3rd-party candidates for governorships are not notable by default, only if they win or receive significant levels of coverage, which she did not.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:45, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:42, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Cullen. WP:POLITICIAN seems pretty clear, here. --Lost tiree, lost dutch :O (talk) 01:57, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to North Carolina gubernatorial election, 2012 per Cullen and WP:POLITICIAN. - Aoidh (talk) 04:57, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.