Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banstead Preparatory School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bishonen | talk 23:43, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Banstead Preparatory School[edit]

Banstead Preparatory School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable (as of yet), not yet existing pre- and primary school. No substantial coverage found, and WP:CRYSTAL applies. The article's author has noted (when removing my PROD tag) that it is going to happen and it is a merger of existing schools with articles, but I still don't find that the merged school has become independently notable at this time; and, since it hasn't existed yet, there isn't much to be said about it independently of its component schools. Others may see it otherwise, but I figured I'd put it up for discussion. Largoplazo (talk) 21:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This doesn't even come close to notability based on the very few sources I could find. It seems enough to add the few sentences on the existing articles for schools that are closing. If the buildings and location are the same, to some extent this is a renaming and continuing history for Greenacre, so should the Greenacre School article be renamed (with a redirect) after the merger of the schools is complete? Jack N. Stock (talk) 05:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails my standards for schools. May be too soon. Bearian (talk) 02:22, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Jack N. Stock (talk) 04:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Jack N. Stock (talk) 04:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.