Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banpresto Originals Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:35, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Banpresto Originals Technology[edit]

This element of the Super Robot Wars series does not establish independent notability. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, this is just made up of unnecessary plot summary, game guide material, and original research. Relevant AfDs include Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Database (Super Robot Wars), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arado Balanga, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AS Soleares/AS Alegrías, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruach Ganeden, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapiéçage. All discussions resulted to deletion of the nominated articles. Magioladitis (talk) 12:35, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. Merge to Super Robot Wars. TopGearFreak 12:42, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - excessive in-universe information, per WP:WAF, WP:GAMECRUFT. Marasmusine (talk) 15:44, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wiki is not a fansite for Super Robot Wars.--Boffob (talk) 15:52, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia isn't a fansite. Stifle (talk) 17:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — basically agreeing with the above in the Wikipedia is not your own webhost. MuZemike (talk) 19:42, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep suitable combination article, of the sort that should be encouraged. The notability of the individual items covered here is not at issue,since its a combination article, if there is excessive detail it can be edited, and the primary sourcing is appropriate RS for this material--there is essentially no real OR. Of course the discussion of a game's details will be in-universe-all that matters to WP:NOT is that not all of the discussion as a whole is in-universe. I think that covers all the objections. DGG (talk) 09:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wikipedia is not a fansite nor a collection of undiscriminate information. -- nips (talk) 21:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.