Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bank of America Canada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:41, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bank of America Canada[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As written, fails WP:NCORP. No references whatsoever. A Google quotation mark-enclosed phrase search for "Bank of America Canada" reveals little, if any, press coverage—all of it related to trivial matters such as the sale of assets, business lines, and, a few years ago, the complete withdrawal from Canada. As such, lacks WP:CORPDEPTH and fails WP:SIGCOV. With their complete exit from Canada, there's no prospect of notability. Since this article arguably never should've been created in the first place or, even if it were, it was created with the wrong CommonName. Thus, I'd just recommend a full delete, as opposed to a delete and redirect. Doug Mehus (talk) 05:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Doug Mehus (talk) 05:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Doug Mehus (talk) 05:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Doug Mehus (talk) 05:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per reasons cited above. Whispering^(t) 23:58, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Whispering, Thanks. Yeah, and the redirect would not be particularly helpful. There is nothing in this ultra-short stub-class article that someone couldn't easily add to Bank of America, if considered useful. Doug Mehus (talk) 23:59, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.