Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bani Hasan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bani Hasan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable area. I think the best thing to do is to redirect this back to Beni Ḥassān like it was in 2008. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:19, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's notable enough to have been in the 1987 Gazetteer. There's a wider disambiguation problem here that I'm setting out to solve at Bani Hasan (disambiguation). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:50, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As we've now seen with hundreds of UAE AfDs, the 1987 Gazetteer is NOT a reliable source. I would even remove the disambiguation link as it fails WP:V. SportingFlyer talk 22:25, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fair enough if the gazetteer is not RS. If this page is deleted then would the closer please move the new Bani Hasan (disambiguation) page to the base name. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:26, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, and leave a categorized {{R to disambiguation page}} behind. Sam Sailor 18:08, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom and Shhhnotsoloud. Not a new article, so plenty of time for proper references to have been found. Personally, couldn't find one. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:02, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not verifiable through reliable sources. Sam Sailor 18:08, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.