Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangledox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 01:17, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bangledox[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm one of the most passionate enviromentalists you'll find but unfortunately I can't find anything to suggest better notability and improvement with the best my searches finding this. Pinging Nikkimaria and Madhero88. SwisterTwister talk 07:09, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough sources.—Eat me, I'm an azuki (talk · contribs · email) 09:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No WP:RS to support claims.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing in the search engines to show they pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:34, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.