Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banana tooth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:13, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Banana tooth[edit]

This is a disputed prod. The editor who removed the prod template claims it's a legitimate term, but I can find no references to this usage of the term on Google (search results). Delete as unverifiable and non-notable neologism.--Muchness 00:35, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Protologism worthy of wider recognition (I, too, have known banana tooth) - but Wikipedia can't be the vehicle for that. Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 00:37, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as neologism --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 00:57, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless someone can WP:CITE WP:RS. Walter Siegmund (talk) 01:03, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TBC.--Firsfron 01:33, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverifiable neologism, per nom. Kuru ^talk 02:59, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 04:09, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Kuru. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 04:11, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Kukini 06:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable phrase coining. Requires citations and references in print before it can be transwikied to Wiktionary. Non-encyclopædic. (aeropagitica) 07:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ad neologism and per nom. --Ter e nc e Ong 10:08, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 14:21, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Wikipedia is not the place to go coining new terms. Get this to UrbanDictionary or Stephen Colbert. 204.69.40.7 14:47, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all. Oliver Keenan 20:39, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete neo/proto, per nom Deizio 00:50, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per stupid? --DragonWR12LB 06:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.