Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banana Kong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:35, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Banana Kong[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. (PROD was removed by the creator of the article.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 01:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 01:46, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – 11 reviews on Metacritic. Reviews: IGN, Gamezebo, 148apps, Slidetoplay and Pocket Gamer are all considered reliable vg sources. --The1337gamer (talk) 08:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - plenty of SIGCOV in RSes, as pointed out by The1337gamer above. That the article is currently a mostly unreferenced stub is a matter for cleanup and expansion, not deletion. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 16:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 12:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but completely redo. The Metacritic sources show that the WP:GNG is met, though just about everything about the content present is written against the Video Game article guidelines. Even the image doesn't make sense. Why would someone put the generic "Android" image there? That's like putting the Nintendo logo as the cover art for a Call of Duty article. Sergecross73 msg me 12:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article was created by a new editor, they probably didn't know exactly how to add the correct image. I just added the image that they uploaded of the game's title screen. --The1337gamer (talk) 19:50, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.