Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bammer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:51, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bammer[edit]

This is probably nonsense, given the name of the author, and doesn't seem to be written seriously. It is some neologism at best, and gives 477,000 google hits, mostly for people's surnames.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:41, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable neologistic nonsense. dbtfz ^talk 02:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Poor. Isopropyl 02:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Author has retaliated by naming the three users above in his/her article as "jokesters".Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 07:04, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. psch e mp | talk 06:50, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. OhNo itsJamie ^Talk 08:16, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 09:25, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Nice spotting, Blnguyen. This article, due to it's "wikiness" would certainly pass a lot of user's BS radar. --Mecanismo | Talk 17:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, please see WP:NEO. 159.134.245.26 01:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.