Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bamboo Feed Reader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:00, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bamboo Feed Reader[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Raising for deletion as the subject has little to no coverage by reliable third party sources, save for a passing mention on pcmag.com. AMFMUHFVHF90922 (talk) 10:18, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not significant enough to pass WP:GNG for a stand-alone article. A web search only finds trivial and passing mentions that list this software among others. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 20:24, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete': There is no significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 21:44, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.