Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bala K. Srinivas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott (talk) 01:54, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bala K. Srinivas[edit]

Bala K. Srinivas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable local politician who fails WP:NPOL. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and the sources for this article are where exactly...? MrMarkBGregory (talk) 21:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete He was mayor of an enclave surrounded by Sam Antonio, Texas. The enclave has less than 5,000 inhabitants. The mayor of Hamtramck, Michigan has a stronger claim to notability, and I am fully convinced she is not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:10, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Smalltown mayors are not extended an automatic presumption of notability just for existing, but this is not referenced anywhere even close to well enough to make him more notable than the norm among a not inherently notable class of topic. Bearcat (talk) 17:35, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:NPOL, WP:GNG. SportingFlyer talk 00:48, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.