Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balázs Bergmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:33, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Balázs Bergmann[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

15 years ago, he played 155 mins of professional football then dropped to a lower level and, in the same season, completely disappeared. He has no trace of a career since 2006 so the likelihood of a future professional appearance is low, therefore, I would oppose sending to draft. Clear consensus at hundreds of recent discussions is that WP:GNG must be met in these types of cases. Google News yielded nothing in the Hungarian name order and western name order. Similarly, this Hungarian source search also yielded zilch. All I can find are stats pages like BeSoccer and World Football, which confirm the weak WP:NFOOTBALL pass but bring us nothing towards GNG. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 12:52, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per above. --Whiteguru (talk) 21:02, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:SIGCOV and as such does not warrant a stand-alone article. As is consensus noted at WP:WINNEROUTCOMES, this should result in delete unless GNG is met through articles I may have missed. GauchoDude (talk) 15:04, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the comprehensive WP:GNG failure makes any presumption of notability in WP:NFOOTBALL invalid. Jogurney (talk) 17:19, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.