Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baker and Partners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:39, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Baker and Partners[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unremarkable law firm; significant RS coverage to meet WP:CORPDEPTH not found. Citations listed in the article consist of passing mentions, WP:SPIP, or other unsuitable sources. Likely created for compensation; pls see: Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Another_day.2C_another_sockfarm. PROD removed by a SPA Special:Contributions/Nathannicholls. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:47, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:48, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lack of in depth coverage beyond press releases indicates a failure of WP:CORPDEPTH.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:28, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:46, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Jersey-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment looks like BakerPlatt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) has been deleted a few times already. Also Bakerplatt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Curious. ☆ Bri (talk) 07:37, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The article makes no substantial claim of notability: the firm's appearance as one of seven in the Legal500 list for Dispute Resolution in Jersey is insufficient for encyclopaedic notability. The other references are run-of-the-mill passing mentions, etc. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 11:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.