Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baker Program in Real Estate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Baker Program in Real Estate[edit]
- Baker Program in Real Estate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable college course (PROD contested with no edit summary and no improvements). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:46, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no reliable independent sources to meet the WP:GNG. Might be a good redirect to something about the main university. Vcessayist (talk) 01:24, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A Top Real Estate Program in US, Joint Program of Seven Cornell Colleges, so doesn't fit neatly under any of them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smw336 (talk • contribs) 02:59, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Where are the independent, reliable sources, showing that the subject is notable? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a rather small, but indepentent program of high prestige, and I dont; see where in the large units of the university to m It might help if someone collected out the notable faculty and alumni of this program from the main cornell listings DGG ( talk ) 08:14, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 23:53, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as there are no independent reliable sources to meet WP:GNG.--Charles (talk) 18:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.