Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BajeYout

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BajeYout[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches found nothing good at all and the best thing I found was this and it's worth mentioning the website is now closed so all signs seem to suggest this magazine closed (no significant edits since starting in March 2007 and it's orphaned). Notifying author CaribDigita. SwisterTwister talk 02:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Barbados-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: We know next to nothing about this magazine, or why it's important or significant. If someone can come back later with more facts and more sources, the article can be recreated. --Slashme (talk) 23:12, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom and Slashme. Nothing notable came up on the search engines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:59, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.