Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baisa (Title)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 10:02, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Baisa (Title)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dictionary definition only thus violating WP:NOT. If it were cited it could be added to the Rajput article, but it's not. SpinningSpark 19:48, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 21:18, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:48, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Still a young article, but even a first version needs more than this. Delete per WP:DICTIONARY. – Margin1522 (talk) 00:15, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 00:06, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Note the result at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banna (Title), a sister page to this one by the same editor. SpinningSpark 00:43, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete some confusion over encyclopedia and dictionary involved here--Mevagiss (talk) 12:44, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Simply a very brief definition of a word, which falls into WP:NOTDICT. --Michig (talk) 08:14, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.