Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bailey Rule

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:30, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bailey Rule[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Moved to main after decline without improvement. Would not have passed the now deprecated NFOOTY criteria: fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG and only source is to a ~~'stats' site~~ league website, where the player gains only a passing mention. Eagleash (talk) 22:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I tried and failed to find any sources that could help satisfy WP:SPORTCRIT. It looks to me that the player is not notable. OliveYouBean (talk) 07:08, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:21, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I also failed to find any sources that would meet any notability criteria. Skynxnex (talk) 22:55, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - best I can find is a trivial mention in SBS Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't meet sportcrit Lightburst (talk) 01:14, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devoke water 14:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT Bruxton (talk) 15:03, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.