Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bai Xiaosheng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:59, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bai Xiaosheng[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

And also:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

New editor just created several articles about films made in Hong Kong in 1946—all of which are unreferenced and star an assortment of Pokémon. Looks like a hoax to me. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 03:44, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 03:55, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I want to err on the side of deleting all to be safe. On brief inspection ghits for Bai Xiaosheng are inconclusive. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gotta speedy delete 'em all as blatant hoaxes (in the case of the two film articles) or non-notable, and will now tag them as such. No hits for "Vigilante Swordman" at all, while a search for "Court Secret's" gives only five inconclusive hits. As for Bai Xiaosheng, as noted above, a search is inconclusive. How can 1946 films starring Pokémon even exist if Satoshi Tajiri was born in 1965? As for the Baidu link in the Vigilante Swordsman article, it links to an unrelated 2011 film of a similar title. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:26, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.