Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badlanders (TV series)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No redirect target is proposed.  Sandstein  18:52, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Badlanders (TV series)[edit]

Badlanders (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per WP:TVSHOW: "...a television series is not eligible for an article until its scheduling as an ongoing series has been formally confirmed by a television network." The subject of this article makes no mention of an airing network, let alone a premiere date! In other words, this series may actually be in pre-production, and thus does not qualify for an article. In addition, the lone "sourcing" used for this article is a sparse (and relatively new) IMDb entry – no other sourcing, to verify the notability of this series, is used. Finally, created by an editor that may have a WP:COI. Needs deleting. --IJBall (contribstalk) 17:54, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribstalk) 18:00, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect. "Badlands" appears to be a skateboard venue in Upland, California and a brand of skateboard and more, if you search search Google, including a 1999 Juice Magazine article. There seems to be a real phenomenon to be covered, and I think there should be a Wikipedia article about it, but I don't find it yet. Let's find or create that article now. Then the AFD can be concluded by mentioning the proposed-or-whatever TV series about it, and redirecting to the article about the phenom itself. I'm willing to create the article myself, will browse for more info. --doncram 21:41, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:28, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:39, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.