Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badin Hall (University of Notre Dame)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2014 February 19.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to List of residence halls at the University of Notre Dame. The article history is still available, so merge material from there as needed. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:31, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Badin Hall (University of Notre Dame)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Other, similar, articles about halls at the University have recently been deleted and redirected to List of residence halls at the University of Notre Dame. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:21, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be deleted. It is a unique topic and is only marked for deletion because I marked it on accident. It is valuable for prospective students entering the university to learn about their future dorm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goobie89 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The article was not "only marked for deletion because you marked it on accident". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh. I thought it was. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goobie89 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- OH! You marked it for deletion because I undid your redirect. It's obvious I'm new to Wikipedia... Why were those other pages deleted and redirected? They're helpful pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goobie89 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of residence halls at the University of Notre Dame. Most of this is irrelevant nonsense that barely has anything to do with the hall itself, and even so the hall isn't really that notable. T C N7JM 22:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of residence halls at the University of Notre Dame. There is nothing about this building or its use that makes it independently notable. --Crunch (talk) 23:03, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nomination does not make a deletion argument, and this is not a high priority topic such as a BLP or corporation. Unscintillating (talk) 23:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps you might read it again; particular the first two words of the prose component. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:18, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of residence halls at the University of Notre Dame. I looked at a couple of the sources, but there is no hint of wp:notability. The material is there to improve the target article. The infobox seems useful, but there is unsourced material in the current article that should all be removed. Unscintillating (talk) 23:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly would we merge that isn't already there? T C N7JM 23:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are asking if I saw something in the sources that isn't currently in the article, to add to the target article. Probably not, but I was only skimming. But if by "already there" you are referencing the target article, then I see a whole new section with an infobox, including the picture, being added. Unscintillating (talk) 01:49, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of residence halls at the University of Notre Dame. No need for a stand-alone article. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 16:01, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.