Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Rats

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 08:16, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Rats[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find video game sources: "Bad Rats" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Poorly received game with little to no coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Lordtobi (✉) 07:50, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. The game is notorious/infamous for being bad. And 2 sources is technically multiple for WP:GNG. Here's a couple more for content: [1][2]. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:28, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as creator. This is one of the things notable for being bad, as the coverage attests. Sandstein 10:24, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:48, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:49, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve. A quick search on the WV:VG/RS search engine definitely brings up some results. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 08:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.