Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backbase (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:11, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Backbase[edit]

Backbase (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I came across this via another user that pointed out that the article is entirely sourced by press releases. I would have PRODed this, but it went through one already.

Long story short, a search for sources didn't really bring up anything other than more press releases and things that look suspiciously like press releases. I found one or two sources like this one and some brief sources like this one, but nothing that would really show that this company would fully pass notability guidelines. If anyone can work some magic on this and find better sources, I'm open to this closing as a keep, but it looks like this company has really only ever been covered in press releases. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as my searches found nothing more than...you guessed it! Press releases and other minor mentions such as one at Books and a few with News. SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.