Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bachak (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:57, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bachak[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Bachak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. There was no consensus at the last AfD but there was agreement that there are no useful sources for this clan. The sourcing situation has not changed but in the interval there has been a gradual deletion of similar articles, which appears to enacting a way forward that was mooted at the prior AfD. Sitush (talk) 21:24, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:31, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 02:52, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Should be part of an article or list, not a stand alone article. Fails WP:GNG Jason from nyc (talk) 23:02, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Not verified. SL93 (talk) 20:39, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.