Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby G Music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Baby G Music[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. No sources cited to show notability of this agency (as opposed to its clients). No GHits or GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:COMPANY. ttonyb (talk) 05:39, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete on this one. I'm with the nom. The article seems to be largely for promotional purposes. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 06:46, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources cited, and web search produced only MySpace, YouTube, music download sites, Wikipedia, etc. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:58, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original prodder for same reasons. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not appear to pass WP:CORP at this time. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:51, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to fail WP:GNG and the page itself doesn't look to provide any useful information. FaceMash (talk) 16:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.