Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babelscores

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:30, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Babelscores[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Online database of musical scores. I think this is probably a well-intentioned creation, but it is ultimately an advertisement with no independent sources. The use of Harvard and Princeton, for example is deceptive because the sources are just pages that say the university has paid to access the Babelscores database. I saw no independent coverage. --- Possibly (talk) 06:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 06:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 06:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 06:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 06:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 06:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:06, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - does not meet WP:WEBCRIT. AntiVan (talk) 13:00, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The nominator's argument is convincing, and a business or website is not notable because it has customers. This one has received no independent coverage as an entity in its own right. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 17:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Sources provided are not providing in-depth coverage of the service, links from BNF, Yale, or Princeton is basically just saying that the university subscribes to Babelscore and here is what Babelscore is doing. None of the sources are independent. Like the nominator, I am sure that this is a well-intentioned creation but there is not enough sources to justify its inclusion on Wikipedia. SunDawn (talk) 11:21, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.