Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babe the Blue Ox (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nomination withdrawn. Liz Read! Talk! 07:28, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Babe the Blue Ox (band)[edit]

Babe the Blue Ox (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

article is about a seemingly unnotable band and does not link any sources. the article also at times has an promotional feel (probably most visible in the second paragraph).Gaismagorm (talk) 16:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Gaismagorm (talk) 16:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I, Gaismagorm, have withdrawn this nomination as it has been brought to my attention to notability of the group as well as sources Gaismagorm (talk)
  • Keep - there are some sources in the external links section, but the AllMusic one is the only one which is independent. That said, there's a lot more out there - this from Trouser Press, for example, and many different articles which can be found through Newspapers.com (with a little patience for sorting through the ones which just mention the mythological figure). In addition, People (Babe the Blue Ox album) is very well sourced, and prong 5 of WP:NBAND (2 albums on a major label) is met. Hatman31 (talk) 00:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    ah I see. you're probably right, this deletion was probably not a good idea after reading a bit more on them, as they also seem to have collabed with a few notable artists (unless im mistaken) Gaismagorm (talk) 11:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    how do I withdraw? Gaismagorm (talk) 11:21, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:WITHDRAWN says to strikethrough the original nomination text and add a note after it saying you withdraw the nomination. Hatman31 (talk) 16:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I wouldn't say they were entirely unnotable – I remember their name cropping up occasionally during the 1990s and they have something of a cult following. That's not enough to give them their own article, of course, but Hatman31 has found a few sources, and at worst I would redirect this to People (Babe the Blue Ox album) if there isn't enough for a band article. Agreed that the article as it stands is almost entirely OR and could probably be TNT'd. Richard3120 (talk) 01:21, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have withdrawn my nomination Gaismagorm (talk) 21:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.