Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babangida Kabiru Ruma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Babangida Kabiru Ruma[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable political activist. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Sources within article are either blogs, interviews, the subject's own websites or don't even mention the subject at all. Notability has not been established. Exemplo347 (talk) 14:51, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Article about a non-notable person lacking in encyclopaedic content. Wikipedia is not a resume. I found 1 some promising sources, but they aren't about his person, we need to know what really makes him notable for inclusion here. Just commenting on national issues isn't enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darreg (talk • contribs) 09:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN.—Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 13:48, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I did manage to find some coverage that is reliable on the page [1], [2], but overall, it does not convince me that WP:GNG has been met, or one of the criteria of WP:POLITICIAN. I had no luck finding additional sources in a google search, but if more coverage could be found, would be happy to change my vote. Yvarta (talk) 02:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
week keep The article is well written and some sources can be found that attests to notability just a pity they might not be enough.Mahveotm (talk) 10:27, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you have found some Reliable Sources that offer significant coverage in independent, reliable sources strictly about the PERSON HIMSELF, then please feel free to link to them here. Exemplo347 (talk) 16:19, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable political activist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:51, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.