Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baatein Ye Kabhi Na (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No further discussion of the sources mentioned and whether they make the subject meet GNG despite relists. On a side note, per Wikipedia:Merging and WP:BEFORE you shouldn't bring articles to AfD if you only seek redirecting or merging. We have other channels for that. So Why 07:37, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Baatein Ye Kabhi Na[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing specifically covering this song.All covg. in general film-song reviews.Singular coverage lonely in promotional writings.The critical reception section writes reviews of the songs from mostly WP:RS sections but WP:NSONGS says ... Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created...; which is what is happening here.'Redirect and/or Merge to film article sought. Winged Blades^Godric 17:32, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: WP:RS not met.-Umair Aj (talk) 20:28, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the critical reception of the article shows reviews by reliable sources Zee TV, India.com and there is also coverage by Indian Express so WP:GNG is passed Atlantic306 (talk) 21:22, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes GNG. Artw (talk) 02:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment--How can't this be covered at the film article?Winged Blades^Godric 03:47, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment--Pinging the participants of the prev. AfD.@Bharatiya29, SwisterTwister, and Dharmadhyaksha:Winged Blades^Godric 07:04, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:12, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily keep - Deserves a standalone article. The article has coverages from reliable sources like Indian Express India Today Zee News.It's a notable song Anoptimistix (talk)— Note to closing admin: Anoptimistix (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:52, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.