Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BYYAH
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Ixfd64 05:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
BYYAH[edit]
Does not meet WP:V, no references. Contested prod (two separate prods). Wikipedia is not a repository of comedy sketches. Risker 04:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Far too minor to earn an article, and too unlikely of a search term to merit a redirect. --Wafulz 04:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Only 331 ghits, and half of those appear to be in Chinese. Caknuck 05:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Trebor 07:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Xdenizen 07:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. MER-C 08:34, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Prod was never contested, simply removed without comment. In my prod, I wrote "No assertion of notability; a video on youtube isn't necessarily notable." That is still the case; nothing has changed. -Amatulic 16:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Already listed on List of Chappelle's Show skits. No need for its own article. BYYAHH! JGardner 00:27, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Do not delete: it's not just a youtube video, it's on tv an dvd as well, it sure as hell isn't in chinese, what happens to be going on with your computer? a LOT of stuff is less than likely to earn a redirect, half of wikipedia is uncommon, isn't that kind of half the fun?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mexican1 (talk • contribs)
- It's an incredibly minor skit with no reliable sources or verification, making it original research. If people want to learn about Chappelle skits, they can go to List of Chappelle's Show skits. --Wafulz 03:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, it's irrelevant what the rest of Wikipedia is like; we're concerned with one article here. If you have a problem with others, either fix them, redirect them, or propose them to be deleted. -Amatulic 21:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.