Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BOSS4GMES

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Copernicus Programme. Daniel (talk) 04:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BOSS4GMES[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotion of non-notable temporary project fgnievinski (talk) 14:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:48, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:14, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:08, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete. Best I got was this crappy-looking blog post that masquerades itself as a professional magazine. 👨x🐱 (talk) 03:20, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Copernicus_Programme and perhaps merge a sentence or two there. Insufficiently notable for a discrete article. firefly ( t · c ) 06:17, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Copernicus_Programme, though I am unsure what if anything could be worth adding there about this temporary coordination project during its set-up. AllyD (talk) 07:17, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.