Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BMP VSTOL UAV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BMP VSTOL UAV[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product. No third-party references are given; none are apparent in searching that I've done. Mikeblas (talk) 16:21, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DGG ( talk ) 04:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Despite what some think, not all cars, of vehicles in general, are notable. This fails WP:GNG as written. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I concur, this is simply a sales listing at this time, and there's certainly nothing to suggest its own article, hence deletion. SwisterTwister talk 06:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.