Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BL Challenge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BL Challenge[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was previously Prod tagged. While Adam Ransom and Dominic Makemson's charity work is admirable, they are not unique and not notable. The only source is their own web site. Þjóðólfr (talk) 19:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I see no particular indication of notability. News sources seem to be limited to classifieds? --Shirik (talk) 19:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this fund raiser. Joe Chill (talk) 19:49, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Peter and Gordon, The Everly Brothers, they aint. GoodDay (talk) 21:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sorry, but not notable. Daicaregos (talk) 22:25, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, or merge with Rallying under a new heading "Rallying for charity". Biscuittin (talk) 17:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mind making a justification along with your !vote? It's hard to have a discussion over delete vs. keep if you don't describe your argument for keep. --Shirik (talk) 11:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable as far as I can see. --HighKing (talk) 12:45, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.