Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BHW

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:39, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

BHW

An extremely not-notable backyard wrestling federation. Nonsense claims such as being the biggest PPV, hell even being a PPV alone is nonsense. Vanity article as the creator is User:BHW and may also fall under wikipedia not being for stuff made up in school one day. –– Lid^(Talk) 12:40, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - I was unable to verify the claims of the article (such as the claim that the federation exists), but as soon as I hunt them down, I will wrestle them all, and take their federation's world heavyweight championship title. Next, I'll recreate the article. My Alt Account 12:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Lincolnite 16:17, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this and all other backyard wrestling federations. NawlinWiki 17:34, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, I don't think there are any notable backyard feds(the same way that individualy e-feds are not notable). TJ Spyke 22:21, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

• Comment, arguably there is one in the OMEGA federation. –– Lid^(Talk) 06:13, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

That is the exception, and mainly because it was from the Hardy Boyz, but I think you would agree that in general backyard feds are not notable. TJ Spyke 21:22, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

• In nearly all of them that is true, but I was stating the exception to the rule. –– Lid^(Talk) 00:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.